Incident Overview

Date: Tuesday 27 September 1977
Aircraft Type: McDonnell Douglas DC-8-62H
Owner/operator: Japan Air Lines – JAL
Registration Number: JA8051
Location: 6,5 km NW of Kuala Lumpur Subang International Airport (KUL) – ÿ Malaysia
Phase of Flight: Approach
Status: Destroyed, written off
Casualties: Fatalities: 34 / Occupants: 79
Component Affected: Aircraft Flight Path MonitoringAircraft Flight Path Monitoring
Category: Accident
A Douglas DC-8 aircraft struck a hillside near Kuala Lumpur Subang International Airport (KUL) in Malaysia during a VOR approach to runway 15. The aircraft descended below minimum descent altitude and continued its descent despite not having the runway in sight, resulting in a collision with terrain.A Douglas DC-8 aircraft struck a hillside near Kuala Lumpur Subang International Airport (KUL) in Malaysia during a VOR approach to runway 15. The aircraft descended below minimum descent altitude and continued its descent despite not having the runway in sight, resulting in a collision with terrain.

Description

Japan Air Lines Flight 715, a Douglas DC-8, struck a 300 feet hill, 4 miles short of the runway while on a VOR approach to runway 15 at Kuala Lumpur Subang International Airport (KUL), Malaysia. The aircraft had descended below MDA of 750 feet. The accident was caused by the captain descending below minimum descent altitude without having the runway in sight, and continuing the descent until the aircraft struck terrain four nautical miles short of the runway threshold. A subsidiary contributory factor was insufficient monitoring of the aircraft’s flight path by the captain under the adverse weather conditions with several aircraft in the holding pattern awaiting their turn for approach and, more importantly, the co-pilot’s failure to challenge the captain’s breach of company regulations.

Source of Information

http://www.jal.com/en/flight/safety/center/accident.htmlhttp://www.jal.com/en/flight/safety/center/accident.html

Primary Cause

Insufficient monitoring of the aircraft’s flight path by the captain under adverse weather conditions, coupled with the co-pilot’s failure to challenge the captain’s breach of company regulations.Insufficient monitoring of the aircraft’s flight path by the captain under adverse weather conditions, coupled with the co-pilot’s failure to challenge the captain’s breach of company regulations.

Share on:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *