Incident Overview

Date: Friday 13 December 2002
Aircraft Type: McDonnell Douglas DC-8-62F
Owner/operator: Arrow Air, lsf Fine Air
Registration Number: N1804
Location: Singapore-Changi Airport (SIN) – ÿ Singapore
Phase of Flight: Landing
Status: Destroyed, written off
Casualties: Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 4
Component Affected: DC-8 AircraftDC-8 Aircraft
Investigating Agency: AAIB SingaporeAAIB Singapore
Category: Accident
The DC-8 approached Changi runway 20R after a flight from Yokota under conditions of heavy rain, resulting in limited visibility. The pilot, operating with reduced lighting, failed to initiate a go-around despite the captain’s apparent control. The aircraft drifted for approximately 1,300 meters before being brought down by the captain. The landing distance available on the runway was insufficient to prevent a runway overrun, resulting in the aircraft remaining approximately 300 meters from the end of the runway.The DC-8 approached Changi runway 20R after a flight from Yokota under conditions of heavy rain, resulting in limited visibility. The pilot, operating with reduced lighting, failed to initiate a go-around despite the captain’s apparent control. The aircraft drifted for approximately 1,300 meters before being brought down by the captain. The landing distance available on the runway was insufficient to prevent a runway overrun, resulting in the aircraft remaining approximately 300 meters from the end of the runway.

Description

The DC-8 approached Changi runway 20R following a flight from Yokota. In heavy rain, the first officer, who was pilot flying, could not see the runway lights clearly up to about 200 feet AGL. He continued the approach. Then he felt that the captain was in control and so he let go of the controls but he did not attempt to inform the captain as to whether he was letting him have the controls or he wished to retain the control of the aircraft. The aircraft floated for about 1,300 m before it was put down by the captain. The landing distance available of runway 20R was 3,260 m. When the aircraft touched down, only about 1,500 m of the runway remained available. This was not enough to prevent a runway overrun. The aircraft exited and came to rest about 300 m from the end of the runway. The crew had earlier ascertained from the Runway Analysis Manual that the aircraft’s landing weight was within limit for landing on the runway, but had not determined the landing distance required (2,560 m) from the flight manual. SIGNIFICANT FACTORS: 1 The FO, the pilot flying the approach and landing, did not elect to go around even though he did not have the runway lights and approach lights in sight at 300 feet above ground. 2 The PIC could have taken over control from the FO when the latter still could not see the approach lights and runway lights at 300 feet above ground. 3 The crew landed long by about 1,300 metres on the runway. 4 The crew had not made a determination of the landing distance required for the landing on Runway 20R. They had just verified using the Runway Analysis Manual that the aircraft landing weight was within limit for the landing.

Primary Cause

Pilot’s failure to initiate a go-around despite limited visibility, leading to insufficient control and a lack of proactive control transfer.Pilot’s failure to initiate a go-around despite limited visibility, leading to insufficient control and a lack of proactive control transfer.

Share on:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *