Incident Overview

Date: Wednesday 26 October 1988
Aircraft Type: Learjet 31
Owner/operator: Gates Learjet
Registration Number: N311DF
Location: Les Eplatures Airport – ÿ Switzerland
Phase of Flight: Landing
Status: Substantial, repaired
Casualties: Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 5
Component Affected: Aircraft ? Learjet 31Aircraft ? Learjet 31
Investigating Agency: BFU Switz.BFU Switz.
Category: Accident
A Learjet 31 prototype experienced a hard landing at Les Eplatures Airport due to a combination of factors. The aircraft’s high sink rate, stemming from a combination of an extreme nose-up attitude and reduced engine power, resulted in contact with the runway. The pilot’s limited experience and the limited runway length contributed to the situation. Terrain conditions, including a steep approach slope, further exacerbated the problem. Furthermore, communication issues between crew members during the approach phase increased the risk.A Learjet 31 prototype experienced a hard landing at Les Eplatures Airport due to a combination of factors. The aircraft’s high sink rate, stemming from a combination of an extreme nose-up attitude and reduced engine power, resulted in contact with the runway. The pilot’s limited experience and the limited runway length contributed to the situation. Terrain conditions, including a steep approach slope, further exacerbated the problem. Furthermore, communication issues between crew members during the approach phase increased the risk.

Description

The Learjet 31 prototype operated on a demonstration flight for a prospective buyer. The aircraft landed hard at Les Eplatures Airport about 50 m past the threshold of runway 24 following a high sink rate. Probable causes: The accident was caused by an abnormally high rate of descent arising from the combination of an extreme nose-up attitude of the aircraft and the reduction in engine power just before making contact with the runway. Factors contributing to the accident: 1) The plane was piloted by unqualified pilot on this aircraft type and having only a minor experience on jet aircraft. 2) The available runway length was at the limit of the aircraft’s performance. 3) The steep slope of the approach that is 4 ø, due to obstacles. 4) The terrain configuration on the approach and the rising slope of the runway. 5) The concern of the flight instructor on the difficult approach, which lay outside the usual operating conditions. 6) Lack of coordination between crew members in the phase preceding the accident.

Primary Cause

Unqualified pilot operation, limited runway length, steep approach slope, terrain configuration, and insufficient crew coordination.Unqualified pilot operation, limited runway length, steep approach slope, terrain configuration, and insufficient crew coordination.

Share on:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *