Incident Overview

Date: Wednesday 17 February 2010
Aircraft Type: Embraer EMB-500 Phenom 100
Owner/operator: Air Minas Linhas A‚reas
Registration Number: PR-UUT
Location: S?o Paulo-Campo de Marte Airport, SP – ÿ Brazil
Phase of Flight: Landing
Status: Minor, repaired
Casualties: Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 4
Component Affected: Aircraft braking system (specifically the emergency brake)Aircraft braking system (specifically the emergency brake)
Investigating Agency: CENIPACENIPA
Category: Accident
On October 26, 2023, an aviation incident occurred at Bras¡lia, Brazil, involving an aircraft with one pilot and three passengers. During the flight to Campo de Marte Airport, the weather deteriorated, leading to the airport operating under Special VFR conditions. Upon arrival, heavy rain caused the runway to become flooded and impractical, significantly impacting the aircraft’s braking effectiveness. The pilot, realizing the braking limitations, applied emergency brakes, resulting in the aircraft leaving the runway and stopping after the left main landing gear broke. Contributing factors included adverse weather conditions, airport infrastructure issues, and insufficient training regarding short runway landings and contaminated runways.On October 26, 2023, an aviation incident occurred at Bras¡lia, Brazil, involving an aircraft with one pilot and three passengers. During the flight to Campo de Marte Airport, the weather deteriorated, leading to the airport operating under Special VFR conditions. Upon arrival, heavy rain caused the runway to become flooded and impractical, significantly impacting the aircraft’s braking effectiveness. The pilot, realizing the braking limitations, applied emergency brakes, resulting in the aircraft leaving the runway and stopping after the left main landing gear broke. Contributing factors included adverse weather conditions, airport infrastructure issues, and insufficient training regarding short runway landings and contaminated runways.

Description

The aircraft took off from Bras¡lia, Brazil on a flight to the Campo de Marte Airport, S?o Paulo, Brazil with one pilot and three passengers. During the flight the weather conditions, which initially were favorable, deteriorated. Upon arrival at the destination, the airport started to operate under VFR Special conditions. The pilot was cleared for an approach to runway 30. The landing took place in heavy rain and during the landing roll out, when applying the brakes, the pilot realized that it did not have effectiveness in the braking of the aircraft. He then used the emergency brake. The aircraft left the runway on the right side and stopped after the left main landing gear broke. Contributing Factors (translated from Portuguese) 1 Human Factor 1.1 Medical Aspect Nothing to report. 1.2 Psychological Aspect 1.2.1 Individual Information Nothing to report. 1.2.2 Psychosocial Information Nothing to report. 1.2.3 Organizational Information Nothing to report. 1.3 Operational Aspect 1.3.1 Concerning the operation of the aircraft a) Adverse weather conditions – contributed The runway became flooded and impractical due to heavy rainfall that interfered with the operation of the aircraft and led to abnormal circumstances. b) Airport infrastructure – contributed There was no efficient drainage system at the aerodrome, allowing the entire runway to be contaminated at the time of the accident, which contributed to hydroplaning and consequent low braking effectiveness of the aircraft. There was no standardized procedure for the evaluation of the runway in relation to the presence of water (wet or contaminated) and its transfer to the air traffic control units to inform the pilots, which contributed to the pilot not knowing in advance that the runway was contaminated. c) Instruction – contributed The aircraft training program did not include specific training for landing on short runways and for varying runway conditions such as wet and contaminated. d) Pilot judgement – contributed The pilot judged that he could use the brakes of the aircraft differently than specified in the manuals, which contributed to the locking of the wheels during the run after the landing. 1.3.2 Concerning ATS Did not contribute. 2 Material Factor 2.1 Concerning the aircraft Did not contribute. 2.2 Concerning ATS technology equipment and systems Did not contribute.

Primary Cause

Adverse weather conditions, particularly heavy rainfall and the resulting flooded runway, significantly impaired the aircraft’s braking capabilities.Adverse weather conditions, particularly heavy rainfall and the resulting flooded runway, significantly impaired the aircraft’s braking capabilities.

Share on:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *