Incident Overview

Date: Saturday 13 October 2007
Aircraft Type: Embraer EMB-120ER Brasilia
Owner/operator: Pel-Air
Registration Number: VH-EEB
Location: Sydney-Kingsford Smith International Airport, NSW (SYD) – ÿ Australia
Phase of Flight: Take off
Status: Substantial, repaired
Casualties: Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 2
Component Affected: Aircraft structure (specifically the left side of the runway)Aircraft structure (specifically the left side of the runway)
Investigating Agency: ATSBATSB
Category: Accident
An Embraer EMB-120ER, registered VH-EEB, taxiing to take off at Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport, Australia, experienced a runway impact after being struck by runway lighting. The aircraft’s takeoff roll was interrupted by a burning smell and a warning, leading to a grounding.An Embraer EMB-120ER, registered VH-EEB, taxiing to take off at Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport, Australia, experienced a runway impact after being struck by runway lighting. The aircraft’s takeoff roll was interrupted by a burning smell and a warning, leading to a grounding.

Description

An Embraer EMB-120ER, registered VH-EEB, was taxiing at Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport, Australia, to take off on a domestic freight charter flight to Melbourne. The aircraft was lined up with the left edge of the runway. Shortly after the take-off roll commenced, the crew reported feeling two or three bumps on the runway, after which time the crew’s attention was drawn to an electrical burning smell in the cockpit, followed by a high-speed warning. The smell dispersed and the flight continued as normal to Melbourne. Pre-flight checks for the return flight to Sydney revealed damage to the aircraft, which was subsequently found to have been caused by impact with the runway edge lighting on the left side of Sydney runway 16R, where the aircraft had started its take-off run. The aircraft was grounded at Melbourne for repair. Contributing safety factors: – The taxiway B4 left edge marking led onto taxiway B5, instead of runway 16R. – Neither of the flight crew noticed the aircraft was not aligned with the runway centreline prior to commencing the take-off roll. – An additional area of tarmac adjacent to the runway between taxiways B4 and B5, combined with reduced visual cues associated with night operations, probably created the impression that the aircraft had proceeded further into the runway than it actually had.

Primary Cause

Impact with runway lighting.Impact with runway lighting.

Share on:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *