Incident Overview

Date: Saturday 6 September 1997
Aircraft Type: Dornier 228-212
Owner/operator: Royal Brunei Airlines, lsf Merpati Intan
Registration Number: 9M-MIA
Location: 13,7 km S of Miri Airport (MYY) – ÿ Malaysia
Phase of Flight: Approach
Status: Destroyed, written off
Casualties: Fatalities: 10 / Occupants: 10
Component Affected: The Dornier aircraft.The Dornier aircraft.
Category: Accident
A Dornier aircraft, operated by Merpati Intan, crashed on Lambir Hill in Labuan, Malaysia, after failing to receive a response to a clearance request from Miri Airport. The aircraft struck treetops at an altitude of 500 meters. The aircraft was operated on behalf of Royal Brunei Airlines and was in the process of obtaining an Air Operating Permit (AOP). The pilot’s visual approach was executed when the reported ceiling was below the initial approach level, leading to the crash.A Dornier aircraft, operated by Merpati Intan, crashed on Lambir Hill in Labuan, Malaysia, after failing to receive a response to a clearance request from Miri Airport. The aircraft struck treetops at an altitude of 500 meters. The aircraft was operated on behalf of Royal Brunei Airlines and was in the process of obtaining an Air Operating Permit (AOP). The pilot’s visual approach was executed when the reported ceiling was below the initial approach level, leading to the crash.

Description

Flight BI839 (Labuan – Bandar Seri Begawan – Miri) took off from Bandar Seri Begawan at 19:03. The crew contacted Miri requesting clearance to land. The controller cleared the flight for the final approach to runway 02, but no reply was received. The Dornier struck treetops and slammed into the slope midway up Lambir Hill (at 500 m) The wreckage was found 07:10 the next morning. The brand new airplane was owned by Merpati Intan of Malaysia, but operated on behalf of Royal Brunei Airlines. At the time of the accident Merpati Intan was in the process of obtaining an Air Operating Permit (AOP). They had arranged Hornbill Skyways to be allowing the flights to be conducted on their AOP. Causal Factors: 1. Commander’s and the First Officer’s decision to execute a visual approach when the reported ceiling was below the approved initial approach level stated in the Terminal Approach Chart; 2. Commander’s and the First Officer’s inability to navigate visually in IMC after they had declared visual with the airfield; Contributory factors to the causes of the accident: 1. The Air Traffic Controller’s decision to clear the aircraft to execute a visual approach when the reported ceiling was below the approved initial approach level in the Terminal Approach Chart; and Whereas the investigator has observed that: 1. Hornbill Skyway’s operational control was insufficient to ensure a pilot that was not his employee and that he had the necessary qualifications to conduct the charter.

Primary Cause

Commander’s and First Officer’s decision to execute a visual approach when the reported ceiling was below the approved initial approach level in the Terminal Approach Chart.Commander’s and First Officer’s decision to execute a visual approach when the reported ceiling was below the approved initial approach level in the Terminal Approach Chart.

Share on:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *