Incident Overview

Date: Monday 20 February 2006
Aircraft Type: Boeing 737-45D
Owner/operator: LOT Polskie Linie Lotnicze
Registration Number: SP-LLB
Location: London Heathrow Airport (LHR/EGLL) – ÿ United Kingdom
Phase of Flight: Taxi
Status: Minor, repaired
Casualties: Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 95
Component Affected: Aircraft Structure (specifically the right wingtip)Aircraft Structure (specifically the right wingtip)
Investigating Agency: AAIBAAIB
Category: Accident
An aircraft struck a parked vehicle in a prohibited area while taxiing to its parking stand. Ground staff failed to observe the conflict, and the pilots continued onto the stand despite the potential obstacle. The aircraft’s turn was tighter than anticipated, resulting in the strike. The incident highlights a potential safety concern related to the stand’s confined space and the driver’s intent to move.An aircraft struck a parked vehicle in a prohibited area while taxiing to its parking stand. Ground staff failed to observe the conflict, and the pilots continued onto the stand despite the potential obstacle. The aircraft’s turn was tighter than anticipated, resulting in the strike. The incident highlights a potential safety concern related to the stand’s confined space and the driver’s intent to move.

Description

While taxiing on to its assigned parking stand, the aircraft struck a vehicle which was parked in a prohibited area. The member of ground staff whose responsibility it was to ensure that the stand was unobstructed, was unable to see the whole stand from his assigned position in the jetty. Members of ground staff who saw the potential conflict were unable to alert the pilots. Three safety recommendations were made. Conclusion The right wingtip of the aircraft struck a van which was parked in an area of the stand which should have been free from all obstructions. The driver of the van was aware that he should not park there and had intended to move to a different position prior to the arrival of the aircraft. Congestion in the baggage handling area of the stand prevented him from doing so. The pilots were aware that the van was parked incorrectly but elected to continue onto the stand, believing that it would not be an obstacle. This would have been the case if the aircraft had been lined up on the stand centreline before entering the stand. However, the commander, aware of the confined nature of the stand, made a tighter turn onto the stand than that indicated by the lead-in line painted on the ground and remained at all times to the right of the stand centreline.

Source of Information

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5422f94340f0b613420006a9/Boeing_737-45D__SP-LLB_01-07.pdf, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/435550https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5422f94340f0b613420006a9/Boeing_737-45D__SP-LLB_01-07.pdf, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/435550

Primary Cause

Failure of ground staff to observe a potential conflict and the pilots’ decision to continue onto the stand despite the risk.Failure of ground staff to observe a potential conflict and the pilots’ decision to continue onto the stand despite the risk.

Share on:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *