Incident Overview

Date: Saturday 11 February 2006
Aircraft Type: Cessna 501 Citation I/SP
Owner/operator: David Roeberg
Registration Number: N501DR
Location: Fort Pierce, Florida – ÿ United States of America
Phase of Flight: Unknown
Status: Substantial
Casualties: Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 2
Component Affected: Brake system (specifically the return mechanism and swage/tube assemblies).Brake system (specifically the return mechanism and swage/tube assemblies).
Investigating Agency: NTSBNTSB
Category: Accident
During landing roll, the pilot experienced loss of directional control and swerving to the left side of the runway due to issues with the overhauled brake assemblies. The pilot reported spongy brake performance and pedals requiring excessive pumping. The brakes were removed for inspection, revealing a return mechanism binding, causing the swage and tube assemblies to compress. This resulted in increased brake travel compared to normal, and a mechanical binding of the normal braking system, hindering directional control.During landing roll, the pilot experienced loss of directional control and swerving to the left side of the runway due to issues with the overhauled brake assemblies. The pilot reported spongy brake performance and pedals requiring excessive pumping. The brakes were removed for inspection, revealing a return mechanism binding, causing the swage and tube assemblies to compress. This resulted in increased brake travel compared to normal, and a mechanical binding of the normal braking system, hindering directional control.

Description

During the landing roll, the pilot was unable to maintain directional control and the airplane swerved side-to side before going off the right side of the runway. The pilot said overhauled brake assemblies had been installed before the accident. He complained that the brakes felt “spongy” and the pedals went “almost to the floor, requiring two or three additional pumps for a hard pedal.” He was told that this was “normal” since the airplane was not equipped with power brakes or anti-skid. The brakes were removed and sent to the overhaul facility. They found that both brake assemblies each had one return mechanism binding. The return mechanism had a self adjusting friction bushing meant to slip along the return pin at a predetermined spring pressure. As pressure was applied to the brake, the pressure plate extended toward the number one rotor, pulling the return pins through the swage and tube assemblies and compressing the return springs. Although the swage should move through the tube, one swage on each brake was not moving freely. The brake travel went further than normal because “normal travel” was never set. Probable Cause: mechanical binding of the normal brake system, rendering directional control impossible. Contributing factors were the improper overhaul, inadequate quality control procedures by the overhaul facility, and the rough terrain.

Primary Cause

Mechanical binding of the normal brake system, rendering directional control impossible.Mechanical binding of the normal brake system, rendering directional control impossible.

Share on:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *