Incident Overview

Date: Tuesday 16 November 1976
Aircraft Type: McDonnell Douglas DC-9-14
Owner/operator: Texas International Airlines
Registration Number: N9104
Location: Denver-Stapleton International Airport, CO (DEN) – ÿ United States of America
Phase of Flight: Take off
Status: Destroyed, written off
Casualties: Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 86
Component Affected: Stall warning systemStall warning system
Investigating Agency: NTSBNTSB
Category: Accident
A McDonnell Douglas DC-9-14, Texas International Flight 987, crashed after rejecting a takeoff from runway 8R at Denver-Stapleton International Airport, Colorado. The aircraft rotated for takeoff before rejecting, triggering a stall warning stickshaker. The pilot failed to stop the aircraft within the runway, leading to overrunning the runway, traversing drainage ditches, striking approach light stanchions, and stopping.A McDonnell Douglas DC-9-14, Texas International Flight 987, crashed after rejecting a takeoff from runway 8R at Denver-Stapleton International Airport, Colorado. The aircraft rotated for takeoff before rejecting, triggering a stall warning stickshaker. The pilot failed to stop the aircraft within the runway, leading to overrunning the runway, traversing drainage ditches, striking approach light stanchions, and stopping.

Description

Texas International Flight 987, a McDonnell Douglas DC-9-14, crashed after rejecting a takeoff from runway 8R at Denver-Stapleton International Airport, Colorado. The takeoff was rejected when the stall warning stickshaker activated after the aircraft had rotated for takeoff. When the pilot was unable to stop the aircraft within the confines of the runway, it overran the runway, traversed drainage ditches, struck approach light stanchions, and stopped. PROBABLE CAUSE: “A malfunction of the stall warning system, for undetermined reasons, which resulted in a false stall warning and an unsuccessful attempt to reject the take-off after the aircraft had accelerated beyond refusal and rotation speed. The decision to reject the take-off although not consistent with standard operating procedures and training, was reasonable in this instant case, based upon the unusual circumstances in which the crew found themselves, the minimal time available for decision, and the crew’s judgment concerning a potentially catastrophic situation.”

Primary Cause

Malfunction of the stall warning system, for undetermined reasons, resulting in a false stall warning and an unsuccessful attempt to reject the take-off after the aircraft had accelerated beyond refusal and rotation speed.Malfunction of the stall warning system, for undetermined reasons, resulting in a false stall warning and an unsuccessful attempt to reject the take-off after the aircraft had accelerated beyond refusal and rotation speed.

Share on:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *